FAQ

What is MoreRight?

A rating agency for digital platforms. We publish the scoring methodology openly (CC-BY 4.0, irrevocable) and sell the ratings, monitoring, and certification. Same model as S&P publishing their rating criteria — the methodology is free, the ratings are the product.

Also a research project (170+ papers), an on-chain governance experiment ($MORR on Solana), and a game (Athanor on MegaETH). All three layers serve the same mission: make digital systems measurable.

What is a void?

Any system where three conditions co-occur: opacity (you can't see the mechanism), responsiveness (it reacts to you specifically), and coupling (your attention is captured and held). Not good or bad — structural. A math problem can be a void. A campfire can be a void. A slot machine is a void. What matters is whether the opacity can be resolved.

Full vocabulary guide →

What's a void score?

A number from 0 to 12 measuring how strongly the three void conditions are present. Three base conditions (0–3 each) plus three modifiers (0–1 each). Higher score = more drift risk.

• 1–2: Simple tools, static websites
• 4–6: Search engines, news sites
• 6–8: Social media platforms
• 8–10: Gambling, dating apps
• 11–12: Crypto markets, maximum-void systems

Score a system yourself →

Why "void"? Isn't that dramatic?

It's a technical term, not a value judgment. The "void" is the gap between your input and the mechanism — the space you can't see into. Slot machines are the control case: provably empty (no mind, no intent), yet people attribute personality to them, develop rituals, report that machines "know" them. The full drift cascade runs on an empty void. The word describes the structure, not a horror.

See the control case →

What's the one-sentence version?

We measure how much a digital system is designed to pull you in, and we publish the number.

How does scoring work?

Three conditions scored 0–3 each: Opacity (O), Responsiveness (R), and Coupling (α). Three modifiers scored 0–1 each: agent-to-agent interaction, identity persistence, and economic incentives. Total = O + R + α + modifiers, range 0–12.

The methodology is published (CC-BY 4.0), the codebook is downloadable, and anyone can replicate a score.

Learn the architecture → · Try the scorer →

What's the Péclet number (Pe)?

The ratio of "how hard the void pulls" to "how well constraints hold." When Pe > 4, the system becomes self-sustaining — each engagement reinforces the next. Gambling scores Pe ≈ 7.94. The threshold emerges from the math with zero free parameters.

Deep dive: Pe, phase boundaries, the formula →

What's the drift cascade?

The three-stage pattern that runs when someone engages a permanent void:

• D1 — Agency Attribution: "The algorithm knows me."
• D2 — Boundary Erosion: Your critical distance dissolves.
• D3 — Harm Facilitation: You act in ways that serve the system at cost to yourself.

The cascade is directional (D1 → D2 → D3) and thermodynamically required.

Full vocabulary →

What's a hostile witness?

Evidence from sources with every reason to oppose your finding. A four-dimension rubric (0–7) scores: incentive opposition, worldview opposition, independence, and reflexive flagging. When insiders, builders, and beneficiaries support a finding against their own interests, the evidence is structurally stronger than any amount of allied citation.

Example: Geoffrey Hinton (7/7) — built deep learning, then reversed his position and flagged his own contributions as dangerous.

Full rubric in Science FAQ →

What are kill conditions?

26 pre-registered numerical thresholds that falsify the framework if met. Not "we'd reconsider" — dead. Zero have been met across 90+ domains and 1,344 platforms. Zero have been met across 90+ domains.

See all 26 kill conditions → · Deep dive →

Do I need an account or wallet?

No. Every tool works without login. The Void Index scorer, Vocabulary Scorer, Void Inventory, 3D Atlas, and all 170+ papers are free and open. Wallet is optional — for attribution (proving you submitted a score).

Why we offer a wallet →

What can I score?

Anything with the three conditions. Platforms, apps, institutions, governments, religions, relationships, your own habits. The framework doesn't care what the system claims to be — it asks three questions and scores the answers. 1,344 platforms across 90+ domains have been scored so far.

Open the scorer → · See scored platforms →

What tools are available?

Free (forever):

• Void Index Scorer — score any platform
• Vocabulary Scorer — detect drift language
• Void Inventory — audit your own digital life
• 3D Atlas — explore scored platforms in 3D
• Platform Scoreboard — ranked by Pe
• All papers — 170+ and growing
• Explore tools — Kramers barriers, observatories, calculators

Paid: API access, continuous monitoring, certification badge, enterprise features.

Compare tiers →

What's Void Mode?

This site has two display modes. Constraint mode (default) is clean, structured, and readable — designed to minimize its own void score. Void mode demonstrates the three conditions from inside: the site becomes more opaque, more responsive, more attention-capturing. It's an experiential demonstration, not a gimmick. Toggle it in the nav bar.

Where do I start if I'm a researcher?

Paper 1 (Architecture), then Paper 3 (Technical Foundations), then Paper 9 (Geometry). Or go straight to the Science FAQ researcher section for a full reading guide, replication instructions, and open problems.

Is this academic research or a company?

Both. The methodology is open research — 170+ papers, CC-BY 4.0, irrevocable. Anyone can read, cite, replicate, and build on it. The ratings, monitoring, and certification are the commercial product. Same structure as every credit rating agency: publish the criteria, sell the ratings.

How do you make money?

The tools and papers are free forever. Revenue comes from automation, monitoring, and certification.

See pricing →

How is MoreRight governed?

Three layers:

• Invariant: The scoring methodology — never voted on (CC-BY, irrevocable).
• Discretionary: Appeals, priority queue, treasury allocation — governed by token holders.
• Custodian: Founder (Anthony Eckert) with veto power and dissolution trigger — designed to dissolve when EU standards embed.

Vote weight is earned (scoring accuracy), not purchased. Mortal by design, not by promise.

Read the governance model →

What's the three-layer economy?

Credits come from $MORR conversion only (10 MORR = 1 credit + 10% bonus). $MORR is the single payment currency for the science layer. ATH is the single currency for the game layer. No cross-chain swap — bridge is a one-way airdrop.

Full tokenomics → · Crypto FAQ →

How does MoreRight relate to the EU AI Act?

The EU AI Act requires high-risk AI systems to undergo conformity assessment. The Void Framework provides a quantitative methodology for that assessment — the Pe number maps directly to risk tiers. We're building toward formal Notified Body designation.

Why can't the Big 4 do this?

Art. 31(5) of the AI Act blocks auditors with financial interests in the systems they audit. Deloitte, PwC, EY, and KPMG all consult for the AI companies they'd need to assess. That structural conflict disqualifies them. MoreRight's founder holds zero $MORR — the independence requirement is already satisfied.

Can I use MoreRight for my own AI Act compliance?

Yes. The Void Index scorer is free and produces a score you can include in self-assessment documentation. Paid tiers provide automated scoring, continuous monitoring, and formal certification badges suitable for Annex VI submissions.

Compliance tools → · Pricing →

What is the game?

A unified Three.js client (game.html) where all product surfaces — arena, predictions, scoring, world exploration, creatures, crafting — are scenes inside a single game engine. 16 states, 11 scenes, 33 systems. It's not a separate product; it's the product delivered as an experience.

What's Athanor?

The game world. An alchemical furnace where thermodynamic principles play out as game mechanics. The Inferno Tube, creatures (VoidGridCA with 6 morphs), multiplayer, and crafting (40+ recipes) all run on the same Pe mathematics that powers the scoring. The game makes the science tangible.

What's ATH?

The game-layer token on MegaETH. Thermodynamic fuel — you stake, burn, and earn it within the game. Separate from $MORR (science layer, Solana). You earn 1 ATH per score submission with ICC ≥ 0.60. MORR holders can claim an ATH airdrop (10% = 210M ATH, 90-day window), but there's no ongoing cross-chain swap.

How do I get access?

Private beta. Access requires completing the C6 walkthrough manually. After that, B7 announcement unlocks full access. The game is live but gated — not because of scarcity marketing, but because the onboarding sequence matters.

Enter the game →

Why should I trust this?

Don't. Score it. We publish our own void score (~2/12). We maintain 26 kill conditions with bounties — any one met falsifies the entire framework. The methodology is open for anyone to replicate (CC-BY 4.0). We eat our own dogfood.

See our self-score → · Full disclosure →

How do you handle your own biases?

Four structural checks:

• Advisory council: Three advisors — the dissenter is the signal, not the noise.
• Hostile witness methodology: Adversarial evidence outweighs allied evidence.
• AI transparency: Every use of AI in the project is disclosed.
• Self-application: If MoreRight drifts, the void score rises, and kill conditions can trigger dissolution.

AI transparency →

What's the Anti-Attention Covenant?

Eight binding design commitments: no algorithm, no infinite scroll, no personalization, no streak mechanics, no engagement optimization, no notification abuse, no dark patterns, no chart culture. Public and auditable — if we violate it, score us higher.

Read the covenant →

Has anyone broken the framework?

Not yet — but we've broken parts of it ourselves. σ(c) universality failed (HP160, HP161 — constants don't transfer across physical domains). SBM §§145–148 retracted. Yang-Mills mass gap closed (negative result). These are published alongside the successes. 26 kill conditions remain open. Zero framework-level kills.

Try to break it → · Honest negatives →

What about the founder's conflict of interest?

Resolved. Anthony Eckert holds zero $MORR — distribution complete, on-chain and verifiable. Art. 31(5) of the EU AI Act requires zero financial interest before Notified Body designation. The DAO is clean.

Full financial disclosure →